Mayor Barnes Has Damaged Her Legacy
![]() By Mark Forsythe The Kansas City Post Leadership is a an elusive quality. Some are born with it. Some struggle to learn, but master its nuances. Others never attain it. The one common thread about the quality of leadership is how quickly it can be lost. I understand that the Mayor is very passionate about the downtown revival that her administration has overseen. If it works, if all the numbers add up, history may give her a place alongside H. Roe Bartle and Ilus Davis as one of the more noteworthy leaders of our city. If it doesn't work, if the Power & Light District fails to meet expectations, if the Sprint Center is plagued by vacant dates and unforeseen design problems, Kay's legacy may be that of the Pied Piper who led us all to our financial downfall. It's no secret that Mayor Kay Barnes has an intense dislike of Mark Funkhouser. She has clashed with him both publicly and not so privately over his audit recommendations for years. It's not uncommon for people to disagree. In fact, it's one of the strengths of a democracy in my opinion. It's the way people handle those disagreements that distinguish the leaders from the rest of the pack. In the last few weeks the mayor has shown herself to be vindictive, temperamental and at times outright hostile. Her latest As I See It column in The Kansas City Star is the final lashing out that leaves me perplexed. She takes issue with Mark Funkhouser's "Pigs at the trough" television commercial. She criticizes the ad for "not naming names" yet returns the favor by "not naming names" in her editorial. She uses vague pronouncements to imply anyone disagreeing with her views is anti-Kansas City. The local equivalent of the "if you don't agree with us the terrorists have won" tactic. The mayor could have been gracious in her support of Alvin Brooks. She could have expressed concern about the intentions and ideas of Mark Funkhouser, yet done so in a dignified manner. She could have endorsed Alvin Brooks, yet pledged to do everything in her power to help whomever the voters select transition into the office and remain an advocate for the projects which she cares so deeply for. She could have risen above all the petty sniping that happens in any campaign. Setting an example of grace under pressure, she might have held far more sway with those she wants to influence. Instead, Kay Barnes has chosen to hold not so secret meetings with wealthy and powerful individuals, not so much to rally support for Alvin Brooks, but to generate angst towards Mark Funkhouser and his supporters. She has held press conferences in which she has shown a side of her personality that few have seen. She has lashed out in print, insulting our intelligence by deigning to "take great offense" "on behalf of the citizens of Kansas City." I need no such spokesperson Madame Mayor. I know whom the "pigs at the trough" are. I'm not one of those pigs. The good people whom I've met going door to door aren't those pigs. I choose to remove myself from the group which you so pretentiously defend. In this case, I have to say Madame Mayor, speak for yourself. |







Comments on "Mayor Barnes Has Damaged Her Legacy"
-
Brent said ... (11:45 AM) :
-
the wife said ... (3:25 PM) :
-
Groucho From Texas said ... (6:08 AM) :
post a commentIt really saddens me about Kay. For the first six years of her reign, I felt like she did a great job as mayor. Her focus was solely on downtown, and a lot of things happened downtown. And downtown KC, and thus the metro as a whole, needed what she was doing.
But things changed after the P&L/Sprint Center proposal passed. I think there is a lot of disagreement on the P&L/Sprint Center -- and whether or not it was a good idea. I think the city BADLY needed this, and I think even without an anchor tennent, the city needed this. I think even if it costs the city a little money, I'm still in favor of the project. If it's a LOT of money, then it was a bad plan. We'll see.
But after the arena proposal passed, I feel Kay spent the last 2 years of her reign paying back the "debts" she racked up over her tenure to make her pet projects happen. I have no idea how the "downtown mayor" came out in support of $350 million in renovations to Kaufman Stadium instead of truly investigating a viable downtown stadium option. Or her support of the Super TIF in her Briarcliff Neighborhood. I feel like the paybacks of things that went completely against what she said her core beliefs were became completely transparent.
And I agree, that regardless of what Funkhouser's opinion is of the P&L/Sprint Center, if he is elected tomorrow, it will be partially his job to make it a success. And whether Kay likes it or not, her legacy may very well depend on it.
You'd think she'd have more desire to cooperate...but again, I feel like she is working harder to repay her debts, than she is at being mayor. And it's sad.
Watching the mayoral melt-down has been very sad. I agree that she could have dignified herself in this situation but hasn't. Instead she's demonstrating how out of touch she is with her tax-paying constituents. Has she been taking political advice from Kathryn Shields?
I think Mayor Barnes' diatribes actually HELPED Da Funk get elected!
A big thank you!