The Powerful Citizens Association - Part II
![]() Yesterday I rehashed the Citizens Association's pay for play endorsement process. On the surface it seems innocuous enough. The CA does send out mailings with sample ballots to registered voters. Printing, mailing and maintaining a voter database of addresses isn't cheap. The CA argues that they are a humble little organization without the funds to do such things on their own so they rely on candidates reimbursing them for all that marketing expense. Fair enough. Let's say I accept that premise (which I don't). Why does the CA feel they need to be in the marketing/publishing business in the first place? If it's such a financial hardship to mail bomb every voter in the city, why not just allow endorsed candidates to place the CA's ubiquitous "Sweep 'em out" broom logo on their own literature? Let the candidates deal with their own printing/mailing expenses. No need to funnel all that money through a third party, right? Wrong. Let's dig back into the CA's 8 day report again. This time class, I want you all to turn to page 8. This begins the Expenses section.
Hmmm. Couple hundred bucks for some postcards. Not too exciting. Let's turn to page 9. Hey, there's that name again.
Wow! In less than three weeks O'Neill Communications racked up $27,275.74 in business from the Citizens Association. Not a bad gig. I wonder how you get a hookup like that? Maybe it's just a one time thing. Maybe it's the lowest bidder? Being such stewards of integrity and reform, I'm sure the CA shops around for the best possible value for their hard earned contributors' money. Let's check the 2003 city elections and find out who the CA used last time. Uh oh. I'm seeing a pattern here.
$42,199.38 in business! Once again, nice gig if you can get it. Probably just a coincidence. At the most there's probably some good old boy connection with some of the power brokers on the Citizens Association board and one of the principals with O'Neill Communications. Just friends doing business with friends. Happens all the time. No big deal. Probably untraceable, right? Ehh, just for fun let's run over to the Citizens Association website and see if any names pop out. It's a long shot, but what the heck.... Uh oh. Citizens Association Board Members: Jerry Adriano, Norine Accurso, Thomas B. Becker, Cheryl L. Bisbee, Janet Blauvelt, Meghan Badwey Conger, Richard G. Cushon, Billy Cutchlow, George Eib, George E. Hicks, Richard Holwick, Jonathan Kemper, Robert V. Lewellen, Kelley M. Martin, Hila "Dutch" Newman, Pat O'Neill, James D. Rice, Michael Short, Mike Sturgeon, Kevin Thomas Draw your own conclusions. It's often said that perception is 90% of reality. The owner of a communications company sits on the board of an organization that does thousands of dollars in business with his company. Tomorrow, the final installment of this three part series. More money and more connections than you can shake a broom at! |







Comments on "The Powerful Citizens Association - Part II"
-
Anonymous said ... (9:34 AM) :
-
MC P. Pants said ... (9:34 AM) :
-
woody said ... (7:30 PM) :
-
woody said ... (7:31 PM) :
-
Stacey K said ... (9:13 PM) :
post a commentThis is truly disturbing stuff. Why hasn't anyone talked about this before? Isn't it illegal?
I want candy
and easy gravy endoresement contracts which durm up thousands of $$$ for my communications firm
and then I want tax abatement so I can build something down at 612 Warf Ave. and place risk on the backs of the taxpayers
give it up for the shorties ya'll
Interesting stuf. Tow of those names are appointees to the City NTDF Committee.
Interesting stuf. Tow of those names are appointees to the City NTDF Committee.
wowsa! those are some numbers. I wonder how I convince the good Citizens that they should get large numbers of balloons for their endorsements & parties.