The City Council’s finance committee was set to discuss a new audit of tax increment financing, or TIF, way back on January 31st. The study is a follow-up to a 1998 report that was critical of the use of TIF and made recommendations for improving, and in some cases eliminating its use.
It was reported by the Kansas City Star that Committee chairman and then mayoral candidate Chuck Eddy delayed the release of the report. Eddy said he wanted the Economic Development Corporation and the TIF Commission to comment on the audit’s contents first. Councilman Fairfield, also a mayoral candidate at the time supported Eddy's position.
“As soon as the report’s complete, we’ll listen to it,” Eddy said.
Since when is an audit not complete until the very groups critiqued by the audit get to comment on it? I have the same complaint about that kind of logic that I did when the Mayor's Environmental Policy wasn't released until the Chamber of Commerce was allowed to "make some changes."
Government should not fear the light of day. Release the audit. Then we can all comment on it. The TIF Commission, the EDC. The Mayor and the City Manager can write another scathing critique to be published in the Star. And the rest of us, the unwashed masses, the proletariat can put forth our ignorant opinions on topics our leadership feels we're too simple-minded to comprehend.
In the interest of full disclosure, I support Mark Funkhouser for mayor. I told him this in person several weeks ago. But this audit goes far beyond the mayor's race. It goes to trust in our government. Ironic that the two principal players in this, Chuck Eddy and John Fairfield finished so far down in the mayor's race they barely even warranted a mention. Also ironic that both have been tied to pro-TIF stances.
This leads me to two logical conclusions.
1. The audit is once again critical of TIF. It has numbers and examples that show the previous audit's recommendations have gone largely unheeded. 2. The pro-TIF groups; The EDC, the TIF Commission, The Downtown Council and the Mayor's office do not want their credibility damaged before they can get a friendly candidate elected to the mayor's office.
In the absence of information, people will naturally assume the worst. I call upon the members of the Finance Committee to remember whom they work for. Us. All of us. Every taxpayer. Every citizen dependent on their leadership, yet bestowed with their servitude.
Release the TIF Audit. |
Comments on "Release the TIF Audit"
-
Anonymous said ... (11:54 AM) :
-
Mark said ... (12:05 PM) :
-
Michelled said ... (3:58 PM) :
-
IDan said ... (6:55 PM) :
-
Mark said ... (8:59 AM) :
-
Anonymous said ... (5:24 AM) :
-
Anonymous said ... (5:24 AM) :
-
Anonymous said ... (5:24 AM) :
-
Anonymous said ... (5:24 AM) :
post a commentActually, Mark Funkhouser was to have released the TIF Audit that HE wrote before he retired from city government to run for Mayor. If Funkhouser can't get his hand-picked replacement to release the audit HE wrote...no one can. He is pulling those strings behind the scene. Makes a great camaign issue, doesn't it?
anonymous 11:54AM,
Interesting theory but it has a few holes. First, if Mark Funkhouser is pulling the strings to hide the audit, how did he get Eddy and Fairfield to do his bidding? They have endorsed Brooks and have been almost hateful towards Mark in the press.
Why would Mark not release an audit that by all accounts is critical of TIF? It would be wholly consistent with his previous audits. No big surprises there.
Finally, I'm glad Mark is unable to pressure his successor into releasing the audit. Unelected politicos should have no such influence in City Hall. I for one think that is a good thing.
Reminds me of the Bush admin "reviewing" the report on global warming/climate change before it was released...and the one on artic drilling/energy exploration.
Mark,
Do you think The Funk would elminate tax incentives altogether? Or do you think he is truthful in saying he will be more judicious in their use?
How does KCMO (that can legitimately claim a need for tax incentives at some level) combat the indiscriminate use of the incentives in the suburbs and surrounding communties, especially for "green field" type developments?
Also this is a huge deal with stealing companies back and forth across the state line. In the end, it only hurts all the communities b/c the total metro tax base is ultimately dimished. What can The Funk do?
IDan,
I think that Funkhouser is advocating TIF reform, not its elimination. Just using some common sense in our decisions. Projects like the Kirkwood and Briarcliff in my my opinion did not deserve TIF.
As far as competing with the suburbs, we need to start leading instead of following. At some point we're going to have to let a company head to the suburbs and not cave in to extortion.
1123002228
http://www.670956655.com
1187073548
[url=http://www.1073538217.com]1073538217[/url]