No more excuses. Get to work.
By Mark ForsytheThe Kansas City Post Of the current council members I had contact with during the campaign, I don't recall one of them asking the voters for patience while they "learned the job." The rhetoric that most politicians (myself included) threw around was they were "experienced" and "ready to hit the ground running." Now is the time we find out what our new leadership is made of. Who is going to hit the ground running and who is just going to hit the ground? It's time to get to work. There is plenty of legislative housekeeping that can and should be addressed immediately. The panhandling ordinance. The Red Bridge Road project. There are also many less high profile issues that need to be addressed. Jurisdiction of codes inspectors. Sidewalk cafe permits and other small business policies. Changes to the codes enforcement process. The list is long. The list is important. It would be interesting if each councilperson transferred all their campaign issues from their sites over to the official website, so we could all track their progress. Think that's going to happen? In fact, one of our elected official's campaign site has already taken down all its Issues content. Another never had any to begin with. It's still "Coming Soon!" Get over to BlogKC and check things out for yourself before all these sites disappear completely. I challenge this new council to use their official web presence as more than a vanity page. Tell us what you're priorities are for the next six months. What ordinances do you intend to author? What ordinances do you intend to change? What policies will you influence to make City Hall run more efficiently? In short, what will you do and what have you done for us lately? |







Comments on "No more excuses. Get to work."
-
Michelled said ... (9:46 AM) :
-
KC Sponge said ... (10:38 AM) :
-
mainstream said ... (7:26 PM) :
-
lamestream said ... (11:28 PM) :
-
Mark said ... (9:12 AM) :
-
mainstream said ... (9:44 AM) :
-
KC Sponge said ... (10:46 AM) :
post a commentI can guarantee you can round up some college kids to help maintain the websites for them (for free) as something to put on their resume. And shouldn't keeping your constituents informed be a part of the job description?
And can we beef up the government channel in the process? Not that I have cable - but when visiting friends I always seem to catch the same freakin sessions and horrible filler commercials.
I say each council person have their own 3 minut spot highlighting their campaign issues and what they're doing to get these done with times when you can view the sessions that relate.
That's open government for you . . . whether there are a lot of people out there actually looking for it or not.
No more excuses? What is that supposed to mean? I'm not sure I get that. They're not in office yet, so I think they've got every right not to conduct the business of the city until their in office.
How about a note of encouragement instead? No more excuses implies they haven't been doing their job, which is a ridiculous claim.
mainstream,
Already the apologists start? I think what the editorial is trying to say is that the newly elected council has already been deferring opinions on anything based on the "excuse" of not being in office.
What happened today? The Red Bridge project was rescinded and delayed until the new councilmembers can get "up to speed" on the issue. Then they authorized hiring consultants at even more taxpayer expense! What happened to all the "experience" and "no learning curve" bullshit they all spouted during their campaigns? Business as usual at City Hall. Same circus, different clowns.
You mainstream are obviously an idiot, a new council member or one of their cronies. Thanks for confirming my belief that we have another bunch of underperformers at City Hall.
lamestream,
I appreciate your support, but let's not use personal attacks. Name calling is not the route to reasonable debate.
mainstream disagrees with what I wrote. Ces't la vie. If we all agreed life would be pretty boring!
We need to give the new city council a chance. And by the way, right or wrong, public policy has to consider the disparate views of those who are governed - which means public policy, necessarily, will often will be on the slow side for those of us who want to see quick action.
There are circumstances that demand quick, decisive action and issues that demand decisive, DELIBERATIVE action.
But it's not beyond the expectations of the public who voted these people into office to see them deliver on their promises. We know it takes time but we also don't want to be ignored or feel we were duped. The first legislative session was promising - hopefully things accelerate and we see things happen. None of the successful candidates ran on a "Stay the Course" campaign - as a voter and as a resident, I don't expect to have to wait as they fill the shoes of their predecessors. I believe this is a way of encouraging them - letting them know that we are watching them in office and have confidence they can make a change if they choose to do so as they promised. We'll see.