The Hyde Park Power & Light District
![]() By Mark Forsythe The Kansas City Post Gatekeepers. In sales, that term is used to describe the person(s) who wields enough power to make or break a deal. A gatekeeper could be someone that signs the checks and has the ultimate decision making power all the way down to the receptionist who may or may not pass along the message that you called. Find the gatekeepers, address their concerns, pay them the proper respect and the sale is yours. Skip anyone in the chain and you'll find yourself wondering how you managed to blow the deal. The Hyde Park neighborhood is finding out what it's like when there are no gatekeepers in City Hall. Kansas City Power & Light is planning on building a substation at 32nd Terrace & Troost. Not just a transformer and a few lines, the plans show an entire complex with multiple high voltage lines scattering out to feed the growing electricity demands of midtown. The map shows an entire city block consumed with a monolithic structure. The rendering, while cleverly lightening and blurring the power lines and giant metal poles, shows a stark wall running the length of the exterior. One more structure turning its back on the street. One more industrial use building further dooming Troost to be a high speed commuter corridor rather than the pleasant, mixed-used avenue it was originally intended to be. This substation is urban planning (or the lack thereof) at its worst. ![]() I understand that as the population begins to return to the urban core that power usage is growing. I appreciate that our aging electrical grid will not be able to keep up with the rapidly surging power demands of a growing populous. What I don't understand is KCP&L's short-sighted strategic planning in continuing to distribute power in the same way it's been done for a hundred years. To use an old business term from the 90's, "the paradigm is shifting." Large centralized coal burning power plants are giving way to smaller, more efficient, regionalized power sources that are cleaner, more fuel efficient and don't require the giant overhead high-voltage power lines. Most of all I'm disappointed with the cavalier attitude of our public utility that Troost and Hyde Park are worthy of being dumped on. Granted, that has been the case for the last 20-30 years, but that doesn't make it right. Even more disturbing is the lack of leadership from City Hall in protecting one of our city's most historic and vibrant neighborhoods. Where are the gatekeepers? In any council district there should not be brick put upon brick without first approaching the city councilperson. It should be standard operating procedure that before the permits are applied for, before the letters of intent are drafted, the financing put into place, and the final plans drawn and stamped the community's leadership must be consulted. Hopefully it's not too late for Hyde Park. Neighborhood leaders are working the phones trying to get their concerns heard. It shouldn't have come to this. But now that it has, let's take notice and work to assure it doesn't happen again. Update #1: Toellner Tells it has a very good post about this same subject. Check it out here. Update #2: From the Hyde Park Neighborhood Association website: Important Meeting with KCP&L—July 9th Please plan to attend HPNA’s meeting with KCP&L regarding the proposed Hyde Park Electrical Substation at 32nd Ter-33rd & Troost and high–voltage power lines along Troost from 48th Street to 27th Street. July 9, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. at Central Presbyterian, 3501 Campbell. Update #3: Nancy Lewis of Fox4 News (as I predicted) aired a story reporting that KCP&L has relented on their self-imposed timetable and will now meet with neighborhood leaders to discuss alternatives. So for now it looks like the crisis has been averted. Thanks to all the readers and thank you KCP&L for exercising some diplomacy. |








Comments on "The Hyde Park Power & Light District"
-
Bob Asher said ... (11:09 AM) :
-
Brent said ... (1:28 PM) :
-
mainstream said ... (1:40 PM) :
-
Brent said ... (1:50 PM) :
-
Eric said ... (2:21 PM) :
-
Brent said ... (2:37 PM) :
-
mainstream said ... (3:02 PM) :
-
mainstream said ... (3:24 PM) :
-
mainstream said ... (3:27 PM) :
-
Jan Marcason said ... (7:30 AM) :
-
mainstream said ... (8:33 AM) :
-
Mark said ... (9:58 AM) :
-
Michelled said ... (10:17 AM) :
-
DaveKCMO said ... (10:42 AM) :
-
mainstream said ... (10:52 AM) :
-
Anonymous said ... (2:01 PM) :
-
Mark said ... (2:20 PM) :
-
Michelled said ... (3:17 PM) :
-
Michelled said ... (3:22 PM) :
-
mainstream said ... (3:40 PM) :
-
Esquared said ... (3:47 PM) :
-
Michelled said ... (5:26 PM) :
-
Anonymous said ... (11:30 AM) :
-
Michelled said ... (9:52 AM) :
post a commentLook on the bright side, Mark: At least there will lots of fresh new wall surface for kids to tag up.
There are a lot of disturbing parts to this story, and thanks for writing about it. It's disturbing that the Hyde Park area (or anything East of Main for that matter) continues to be the city's dumping ground for projects. It's disturbing when city council leaders throw up their hands that it's too far along and they can't do anything about it in spite of them just finding out about it. It's disturbing that none of the 3rd District reps, which border this project and have a vested interest in Troost becoming more than just the dividing line between haves and have nots in this city have not responded to anyone regarding this (even if it isn't in their district, they will be negatively impacted). It's also disappointing that this will litterally be adjacent to homes on the National Historic register. It's also disconcerting that these plans are announced a month after the city council member from the district that lives on this block gets out of office.
Man I wish you'd have won.
Another great post, Mark. This is a travesty, and we need to do something about it.
Do we know where Marcason and Gottstein stand on this?
Why do we think things are past the point of no return?
Mainstream,
I've contacted Jan and Beth on this. Susan (Jan's assistant, was Glover's assistant previously) is busy working on zoning variences, etc that can be used to stop it. Jan herself has seemingly shrugged it off as "beyond her control". Beth's assistant sent an email saying "thanks for bringing this to our attention, we'll look into it" -- and since then, crickets are chirping. Honestly, Jim Glover (who lives a block away), state rep Jolie Justus, and Funk's office seem to be the most concerned and working the hardest to find a better alternative.
Calm down folks. If the NIMBY's in Hyde Park can kill light rail then I'm sure they can kill this power station.
They'll raise enough of a stink that KCP&L will just move it further east to a neighborhood that is less well organized and less able to fend off something like this.
Eric,
This is a far bigger issue that simple "NIMBY-ism". I have yet to hear anyone (and hope not to hear them), request that this get moved into someone else's neighborhood. This is a horrible location for this because a) it directly ajoins a neighborhood -- it would be a far better location to put this in an area that is light industrial (and there are many such areas nearby) b) it will further separate the neighborhood of Hyde Park from the redeveloping area along Troost, further enhancing Troost's reputation as a racial/classal dividing line in this city
There are several completely abandoned areas very near 71 Highway (areas that were torn out for the building of the highway -- we won't address that social injustice here) that are now several city blocks of completely vacant land. There is also plenty of light industrial space that won't block off an entire city block of neighborhood from potential retail.
And for the record, OLD Hyde Park killed the light rail plan, not Hyde Park.
Well, here's what I know, and I'm not vouching for the accuracy of anything I say.
It appears that KCPL may have actually been on more of a fishing expedition, which may explain why no one in city hall knew. There apparently were 15 sites located along the Troost corridor (and evidently it has to be on the Troost corridor for infrastructural reasons) that were eventually narrowed down to 6 then 3.
There were the usual excuses of property owners unwilling to sell, which is why they went with the location they did (who knows if they offered, and offered a decent amount of money to property owners...)
However, there is an IBC site that will work just as well, north of the 32nd street location, which may be more suitable - I need to drive by it, I don't recall if it's the Wonder Bread facility near Operation Breakthrough or not.
I'm fine with a location on Troost, if that's a true technical constraint, if the location is north and in what was and will be an "industrial"-like area - and not a part of any future Troost planned mixed use development....
I think there's another meeting Jan 9th at Central Pres.
With Glover's involvement, and continuing to light a fire under Marcason and Gottstein, and few 5th dist folks we should be able to manage this thing, I think....also remember Susan Borge lives in Hyde Park, so Jan will be getting a close-in perspective.
I just can't believe the KCPL folks would act so inappropriately - I'd love to know the story behind that....unless the City was involved and didn't act.
Eric,
what light rail plan was killed? it's understandable that if anybody would do it, it would be the Old Hyde Park neighborhood association - I've heard that group tends towards extreme views...
I forgot to note that IBC is in bankrupcy which is what is mucking up the site north of 32nd....
While I did use the unfortunate term "done deal" to convey KCP&L's stand on the proposed power substation, I want to set the record straight on my actions to reverse their position. KCP&L does have a contract on the property on the West side of Troost between 33rd and 32nd Terrace. Once I knew the proposed location of the substation, I had my Aide coordinate a meeting between KCP&L and the Hyde Park residents. After the meeting KCP&L agreed to consider alternate sites for the substation. We will work closely with the neighbors (in the 4th and 3rd Districts) and KCP&L to reach a suitable agreement on the location. There are three more neighborhood meetings scheduled on this issue. As soon as I knew about the plans for this substation, I took action to address the situation. I agree that it was unfortunate (unacceptable) that the City Council members (past and current) did not know about the actual plans before it reached this stage.
Wow, an actual elected official responding on an blog.
I think that's great.
KCPL knows (or should know) the ropes about site acquisition and mangement better than just about anybody else- real estate is a huge part of their business.
I hope at some point we know who dropped the ball here, and knowing that fix things so that this type of miscommunication can be prevented in the future.
Typically when City planners et al (and City Council members, City Plan Commission, Landmarks Commission etc) are involved, they always ask the question "has this been run by the neighborhood association". Obviously it didn't happen here, on either side of Troost.
Thanks Jan, for jumping on here.
The good news is the Fox4 has hit this site for two days running. The last time that happened they "coincidently" did a story on KC's Compressed Natural Gas vehicles.
Perhaps this issue will get some air time.
Jan, when were these meetings? We weren't notified of any meeting on this...and when are the next ones?
why would fox care about this story? oh yeah, they can go with the "your children are next!" angle for 60 seconds before they seque into 10 minutes of sports and weather.
putting embarrassing broadcasters aside for a moment, where is the existing KCPL substation serving the 4th? i know there's one taking up a whole city block at 18th/holmes, and i'm pretty sure there's already one further south on troost. can't these facilities be upgraded instead of duplicated?
Mark, I haven't checked out the Hyde Park Neighborhood Association site, but I think you're the only person that's trying to elevate this issue in an organized way.
Truly concerned citizens should be insisting on some sort of organization of the issue, other than having to get their information verbally and anecdotally from people who attended ONE meeting.
I've tried to document what I have heard on this blog to better frame the issue -- and Mark, you're doing a service to many people through your post.
Keep up the good work, attention to details and the energy to get and keep the issue out in front.
Mark your knowledge or rather lack thereof of the power industry in America is frightening.
anonymous 3:01PM,
Please enlighten me. What exactly is so frightening about my alleged ignorance? If I have made any factual errors, please point them out and I will be most happy to remedy them. I'm always willing to learn, and if I'm wrong about something I'll be the first to admit it.
Mainstream - did you read Brent's comments? Or his blog from the 19th? http://btoellner.typepad.com/my_weblog/2007/06/stepping_up_for.html NHP is fighting a lot of fires by getting crapped on by HUD, the Codes Dept (via C.Williard), the constant crime problems and now KCPL. I will admit I don't expect too much help from Central HP.
And yes, Dave is right, there are substations all over already. But there is a lot of research to be done to figure out what's going on and why they think plopping one down in the middle of a neighborhood is a good idea. Because KCP&L isn't going to present any evidence other than what benefits them. Plus, the CYA that will inevitable go on by our city govt to try to pass the blame...
http://www.hydeparkkc.org/
"Please plan to attend HPNA’s meeting with KCP&L regarding the proposed Hyde Park Electrical Substation at 32nd Ter-33rd & Troost and high–voltage power lines along Troost from 48th Street to 27th Street. July 9, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. at Central Presbyterian, 3501 Campbell."
Michelled - wasn't aware of that blog. Just checked it out, thanks.
anonymous 3PM,
This is not Tony's Kansas City. Take your insults somewhere else. What are your credentials that qualify you to criticize? If you don't have something constructive to add then get lost.
Mark,
I think I see where you're going with "decentralized" power distribution but do you really think the technology is ready and affordable? I know you're a fan of alternative energy but right now I think (my opinion) that it's too soon to expect KCPL to go that way.
Story tonight on Fox 4 news...not sure which broadcast.
let's hope kcp&l builds this right behind david scott's house. maybe he can get a light rail station there, too. we'll give him the latte franchise for he and his idiot buddies at the urban society.
REMINDER: Meeting is tonight.