Quote of the Day provided by The Free Library


Thursday, August 23, 2007

Developers have Southmoreland Neighborhood in a TIF


By Mark Forsythe
The Kansas City Post

One of my favorite running routes passes through a beautiful little enclave at the southern edge of the Southmoreland neighborhood. From the Kemper Museum I head down Walnut, past the bed and breakfast and The Simpson House; then around the curve and east on 46th Street in front of the early 20th century brick apartment buildings before spilling out at Southmoreland Park. These little brick apartment buildings have served as home for many college students; Plaza restaurant wait staff; retail workers; young singles as well as retirees who can't afford the luxurious confines of Oak Tower or The Sophian. They are of the same vintage as the apartments torn down at the opposite end of the Plaza for the West Edge development and are more or less the last of their kind in the Plaza area still available as rentals.

In this morning's Kansas City Star we read that once again our diminishing stock of affordable housing is being assaulted by developers looking to make a quick buck at the expense of a charming neighborhood. The Wilson Development Group consists of siblings swimming in Texas oil money looking to level the entire block of apartment buildings so they can erect a luxury hotel; condos with an average $360,000 asking price; a 400-space parking garage; and two restaurants. And what better project manager to hire than Ray Braswell? Mr. Braswell has experience with tearing down friendly little brick apartment buildings. He was the developer on the aforementioned West Edge project.

Councilperson Beth Gottstein is "impressed" that the Wilson brothers and Ray Braswell "came to the neighborhood and asked, 'What do you think?'" She must be easily impressed. Perhaps Ms. Gottstein should ask the West Plaza neighborhood "What they think?" about their experiences in the exact same situation. They too were asked 'What do you think?' before West Edge Development went ahead and did what they were going to do anyway. There's a big difference between "What do you think?" and "We will defer to the wishes of the neighborhood." Beware developers bearing foam board renderings and asking "What do you think?" History tells us that there's already a bulldozer parked outside.

So not only does the Wilson Group want to tear down some more of Kansas City's history and evict the very people who work in neighborhood businesses, they want the taxpayers to help them do it. In a neighborhood that principal Andrew Wilson describes as "one of the best places in the country for this kind of project" in almost the same breath asks us to chip in about $15 million in TIF for a parking garage. If "one of the best places in the country" needs a $15 million handout to make the numbers work, maybe we should all just pack it in and go home. There's no hope for any of us. How much taxpayer assistance would a project need in a "least desirable area?" Has everyone forgotten what TIF is for?!

I'm told that at the the July meeting with the neighborhood, Mr. Braswell implied that TIF would not work on the east side of Kansas City right now but this project was a logical "bridge towards Troost" to enable TIF-backed development to gradually work its way east. That's a bit of a stretch. I'm also told that perhaps the biggest open mouth insert foot moment of the evening was when Mr. Braswell implied that the current residents of the apartments were somehow less than desirable for the Southmoreland neighborhood. It was at that point that the associate pastor of the Community Christian Church where the meeting was being held informed the developers that she is one of the "riff raff" of which they were so magnanimously offering to rid the neighborhood. I would say that moment must have been "priceless" but at the tune of $15 million I it's more appropriate to say "pricey."

This should be an easy "no" for the current TIF Commission and City Council. No to tearing down affordable housing; No to wiping out part of the historic charm of Southmoreland and the Plaza; and a great big NO to using taxpayer dollars to line the pockets of insensitive developers.

And one final note to the people casting aspersions on the "riff raff" living in the 46th Street apartments? A lot of those people work in the see and be seen restaurants you love to frequent. Just about everyone I know, myself included has at one time or another worked in the service industry and can tell you it is never, NEVER a good idea to insult the people that handle your food. Just my own little piece of free advice. No TIF required...

Comments on "Developers have Southmoreland Neighborhood in a TIF"

 

Blogger Russell said ... (1:15 PM) : 

As long as there is no TIF, the developers should be able to do what they want as long as they aren't breaking city codes.

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (1:34 PM) : 

"As long as there is no TIF, the developers should be able to do what they want as long as they aren't breaking city codes."

Wow! I don't even know where to begin with all the things that are wrong in that sentence.

 

Blogger Russell said ... (3:42 PM) : 

You think they should get TIF? TIF would be ridiculous for this project.

Maybe you want them to violate city building code?

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (3:54 PM) : 

I don't understand how you could justify public dollars subsidizing development of some of the hottest real estate in the region.

Anybody can satisfy the TIF "but for" analysis if they either (1) pay too much for the property that they're developing and/or (2) they want to build something that the market can't support.

Heck, I can justify a TIF based upon this logic on the house I was trying to buy earlier this year.

They wanted $120,00 for it, and I determined that it would take another $80,000 to make it marketable. Problem is, house comps in the neighborhood clearly indicated I could only expect $160 for the house on a good day.

Do I deserve a TIF? I can certainly satisfy a but-for analysis, just like they can for the Cleaver Blvd TIF.

It's the same situation, and it's actually worse - those apartments they want to tear down aren't blighted; and they are surrounded by some of the best real estate in a premier residential/arts district.

 

Anonymous bellastagiona said ... (4:51 PM) : 

so who do we contact to protest and rabble-rouse against this proposed development? ...or is it too late for that sort of thing?

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (6:16 PM) : 

Bella,

People on another blog have been talking about contacting the two council people that serve that area Beth Gottstein
(her assistant: jim_giles@kcmo.org)
and Jan Marcason (her assistant: susan_borge@kcmo.org)

 

Blogger Mark said ... (6:19 PM) : 

russell,

First, thank you for the comment and welcome!

I think maybe anonymous 2:34PM disagrees with you about the "do anything they want" part? I can't speak for anyone else, especially when I'm guessing.

I to disagree about the "do anything they want" part. While your statement is accurate, indeed developers can do whatever they want within the law, they sometimes won't if they are influenced by enough resistance from the community.

Just because something is legal, doesn't always make it moral, wouldn't you agree? It would be legal and within code for me to buy up every house on my block and then level them all just give myself more space, but in my opinion that wouldn't be the right thing to do.

 

Blogger Mark said ... (6:28 PM) : 

Bella,

It's not too late despite what anyone may try and tell you. Like the Power & Light substation issue on Troost, I'm told the developers only have an option on the properties at this point. They haven't actually entered into a sale agreement yet.

I have a friend who lives in Southmoreland who is keeping me appraised of developments. This person is pretty sure there will be another public meeting and I'll be sure to let everyone know.

I myself want to meet the associate pastor from Community Christian Church. She sounds like my kind of people! I guess that makes me riff raff too? ;-)

 

Blogger KC Sponge said ... (7:20 PM) : 

I had the pleasure of having Mr. Braswell come speak to my Community Redevelopment class last night and speak to this new plan he has at The Hawthorn. He's obviously a talented architect and innovative developer, but I was glad he was at a safe distance so I didn't get doused by his slime. He touted his 6 issues in development - 'The Approach' was highlighted by the West Edge development. He mentioned during the discussion about how TIF is a win-win for the city and developers and how one project is not affected by past ones, nor does it affect future development. 'Timing' was where the Southmoreland project came up - how the condo market is oversaturated and we need to provide some rental units - that of course can be converted into for sale units after the five required years - to the community. He got into his bridge to Troost rant soon after while describing his plan of turning the Landing into an outlet mall to bring the very desirable Mission Hills mothers over to the east side ('The Product'). 'Yeah, scary people are there now - but good people go to good places and bad people go to bad places.' I work at the Landing. I shop at the Landing. I asked him about plans I had heard to turn the landing into a kids community center, maybe skate park - and he just looked at me and said, 'it would never work.' Work for what? Improving the community? Yes, it would. Brightening up that corner and letting people know there's something there? Yes, it would. Bridge the gap across Troost and bring communities together? Yes, it would. Make him a lot of money? No, I guess that wouldn't happen. Silly me.
Mr. Braswell came to another of my classes last semester - Community Economic Development - and gave pretty much the same spiel. But we had a woman running for city council in our class who wasn't going to hear from another developer touting lucrative, gentrifying development as community development, wasn't going to hear excuses about TIF being used to clear more 'blight' on the plaza, or trying to clear communities of 'undesirables' and spoke up against him. That's when I decided I was voting for Sharon Sanders Brooks because I wanted to and not just out of default. It would have been interesting if another woman running for council had been there in my class . . . "Ms. Gottstein, you may want to wipe that drool from your chin . . . I would do it, but my hands are a little too greasy."

And any of you out there interested in the Braswell Method of Development, the remaining issues are Philosophy, Vision and Opportunity. I really wish I liked the guy. . .

 

Blogger KC Sponge said ... (7:20 PM) : 

sorry to clog your comments . . .

 

Anonymous mainstream said ... (8:09 PM) : 

Good comments, Sponge. You're not clogging up anything as far as I'm concerned!

 

Anonymous Adrianne said ... (9:34 PM) : 

I'm sure the residents are dismayed that their neighborhood has become a blighted eyesore overnight! Our new City Council slid into office on claims of "not on my watch" and other anti-TIF abuse rhetoric. Let's make them actually uphold their campaign promises.

 

Blogger Russell said ... (8:24 AM) : 

Mark, I am fine with the neighbors doing what they can to stop this...I just don't think it's the city's job to get involved (with subsidies or restrictions other than existing laws.)

I also question whether or not this project is "immoral". I'm sure it will be rough for the neighborhood initially, and I don't like to see interesting (albeit rundown) historic buildings leave, but the residents might get used to having two restaurants on their block, and their property values might get a boost from living next door to $350k condos.

Not only that, great people like the minister that would be displaced might be able to help a neighborhood that isn't halfway between the Nelson-Atkins and the Plaza. There's plenty of affordable places to live that are still within walking distance of the Plaza. Again, it's an inconvenience for those displaced, but it might do more good for the city overall.

That said, NO on TIF.

 

Blogger Mark said ... (8:44 AM) : 

adrianne,

Agreed. The same council that now has one of its own saying things like "I hope it's a TIF we can afford."

To quote John McLaughlin.. "WRONG!!!" The correct answer is "This is a prime example of TIF abuse and as a steward of the public trust I will not stand by and advocate spending $15 million in taxpayer funds on a parking garage for an exclusive hotel and condo development."

But that's just me.

 

Blogger Mark said ... (8:48 AM) : 

Russell,

You and I are a lot closer on this than it may appear. "Morality" is a subjective term, isn't it? I might stand in front of Union Station and look at Science City tacked on to one side and 2 Pershing Square on the other and think "That's immoral!" whereas someone else might think "It's not so bad."

"Immoral" is perhaps a little over the top but I am prone to hyperbole when I get passionate about some topics! :-)

 

Anonymous Former West Edger said ... (10:24 AM) : 

I've seen Braswell's slimy little spiel a couple of times. Right before I was evicted from my apartment on the west side of the Plaza.

Mark I love the comment about pissing people off that handle your food! So true! I'm confident Braswell has consumed a lot of kitchen staff spit in his time!

 

Anonymous missspider said ... (11:15 AM) : 

Russell-
"their property values might get a boost from living next door to $350k condos"

I question the extent to which could boost property values considering the current (and anticipated future) housing market. In the short run, buyers not want to purchase a home across the street from a construction project with ongoing road blocks and debris. Additionally, IMO - I wouldn't want to live anywhere near restaurant dumpsters w/ out of state landlords. (rats anyone?)

All that being said - vacant condos listing at $360,000 will not help a Southmoreland resident get a higher asking price for their condo or house, becuase additional condos creates more supply. I'm no economist, but until occupancy is sufficient in all plaza condos having additional high-end condos available will only favor the buyer - not the seller.

I think we really have to be careful not to let the Ray Braswells of the world plant fictions in our head about how additional supply will increase demand.

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (11:58 AM) : 

tear down jefferson on the plaza instead. what a blight after just one decade.

 

Anonymous LifeLongCitizen said ... (1:42 PM) : 

Mark,I live in Soutmoreland and those buildings are a blight on the neighborhood. They are run down with grossly inadequate parking, and there is no way it could be economic to rehab them and get anywhere near the rent required to pay back the cost of the rehab. As a result they will just get more rundown. If we don't start improving the areas adjacent to the Plaza and Brookside (have you been down Warwick north of 43rd St lately)the City will continue to deteriorate and we will be left with no middle class residents and then who will bear the cost of improving this city. Every great city in the world undertakes redevelopment to remain vital--thank goodness the Nelson undertook its improvement project, but if we don't improve the neighborhood around the Museum it will all have been for naught.

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (2:07 PM) : 

As someone who has visited these apartments numerous times, I can tell you that they are in horrible shape. The landlords haven't done anything to improve them in years, and really are nothing more than slumlords near the Plaza. At this point, I don't even know that they could be rehabbed. That's not the developers fault ~ at least they see what this neighborhood could be, instead of contributing to its decline.

 

Blogger Mark said ... (2:08 PM) : 

lifelongcitizen,

"Every great city in the world" has affordable housing close-in to its destination areas. The area around the Walker Art Museum in Minneapolis has zero parking but yet it remains a vibrant and vital part of their urban core.

"Every great city in the world" does not have block after block of parking garages. Name me one. New York? Good luck. Paris? I don't think so. London? You can't even drive into the Chelsea area without paying a congestion fee. A parking garage? I don't believe I saw one the entire time I was there.

I'll freely admit the apts along 46th could use some repair, but they are certainly not "blight on the neighborhood" you portray them to be.

 

Blogger Mark said ... (2:14 PM) : 

It appears the spin doctors have arrived! "Blight on the neighborhood!" "Beyond repair!"

The conditions you're describing are codes issues. Are there not two councilpeople that live in Southmoreland? If things are that bad, how come our elected representatives haven't called this "evil slumlord" to task and made him repair the properties? That's kind of their job, isn't it?

 

Anonymous South_Morie said ... (2:16 PM) : 

Lifelong -

Let's talk about 43rd & Warwick - that you brought up in your post above.

On the NE corner of 43rd and Warwick is The Berkeley. Two years ago a developer took that run down apartment building (it was in much worse shape than those Apts on Cleaver) gutted the interior and developed 24 condos. After a year all 24 have sold – 1 bedrooms $99K, 2 bedroom units $139K. Pretty affordable, huh? And the developer made a tidy profit.

That’s the kind of neighborhood development that makes sense. The building looks great and the character of the neighborhood is actually enhanced.

Those apartments on Cleaver are not blighted, and you can fix them up if you pay the right price for the property. No one knows what purchase price is being talked about, and how much cashflow the current owner is banking. Quite a lot I expect given the long time he has owned them.

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (2:25 PM) : 

Mark,

Love to read your KC Post! One thing... the spin doctors may be arriving, but make sure you get the quotes right. I didn't see "evil landlord" or "beyond repair" in the spin doctor(s) comments. Keep on fighting for us!

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (2:27 PM) : 

OMG! lifelongcitizen please leave my city! Move to Independence where there's parking as far as the eye can see. What a utopia that must be. Acres and acres of surface lots and covered parking structures.

Like Mark says, parking is not a trait of a "great city." I don't recall seeing the boulevards of Paris lined with parking. But since you say you're a life long citizen perhaps you've never even traveled outside of KC?

You live in a freaking CITY. Start acting like it.

 

Blogger Mark said ... (2:33 PM) : 

anonymous 2:25PM,

You're right. I was using my creative license. Part of me wants to say "Nyanh! It's my blog and I'll do what I want!" but I will refrain... :-)

The actual quotes are much better anyway.

"blight on the neighborhood"
"run down"
"grossly inadequate parking"
"slumlords near the Plaza"

 

Anonymous mainstream said ... (2:42 PM) : 

Ok, Mark I can't help myself here. Anon at 3:07 is an inexperienced blogger and working on behalf of the developer.

When someone says

"at least they see what this neighborhood could be, instead of contributing to its decline."

I have to clear my throat, take a deep breath, and calmly ask that person WHAT TYPE OF PERSON CONSIDERS A LARGE HOTEL SOMETHING THAT BUILDS A NEIGHBORHOOD?

Unless, of course Anon at 3:07 lives in a hotel themselves, and considers the Colgate-Palmolive Sales Rep from Pittsburgh snoring "next door" a neighbor.

Neighbors don't come to your neighborhood in a cab, stay two nights, and then fly back to their home in Fresno in the morning.

geesh.

 

Blogger Mark said ... (2:50 PM) : 

mainstream,

Thanks for making me laugh out loud. What a roundhouse! I can almost hear Cosell "Down goes Foreman! Down goes Foreman!"

That's a boxing reference from the early 70's for you youngsters following along at home.

 

Anonymous missspider said ... (2:51 PM) : 

south_morie -

I totally agree with you!! We need more people like you in our city.

lifelong resident -

You are obviously out of touch with what is "middle class". $360,000 is just a little out of reach - even for a college educated professional. Move to Mission Hills or Leawood if you want to be surrounded by wealth.

 

Anonymous LifeLongCitizen said ... (4:29 PM) : 

Mark,
New York, Paris,(real middle class enclaves) and London(the world's most expensive city)please start thinking and stop emoting. The parking you don't see in NY is underground and they actually have public transit, which we will never have as long as the economicly able continue to move to Johnson County, where, because of the state line, they will never have to share in the cost of public transit. New York is constantly undergoing redevelopment, which you might know if you ever left Brookside. I live in the city where I was born because I believe in an urban future not a urban myth rooted in nostalgia that ignores economic reality. I want a city of mixed uses that is walkable, vibrant and ever improving, not just a run down dormitory for college kids on their way to the suburbs.

 

Anonymous mainstream said ... (7:09 PM) : 

Southmoreland currently has the Marriott, Best Western, and Holiday Inn within a few blocks. And don't forget about the Southmoreland bed & breakfast. Embassy Suites and marriot Courtyard are just another block away.

That's 6 hotels/b&b wthin about a 4-block area.

Southmoreland is also a ten minute walk away from another 5 hotels.

So you're going to tell me that ANOTHER HOTEL is central to your "urban future"?

You and anon at 3:03 need to get a hotel room together.

Walk down any number of streets in Lincoln Park (Chi) and that's a definition of an urban future.

Wait a minute, I've got it!!! Walk down 46th street east from Main in Kansas City, that's a perfect definition of our urban future.

Mixed income.

Interesting, varied architecture.

Walkable.

People visit years later because the have memories as a young adult living there.

Yep.

 

Anonymous plaza renter said ... (7:58 PM) : 

Hey, I am in favor of rentals on and near the Plaza, but I got to tell you these apts are scary. I checked them out a year ago, and serious dough is needed to fix them. Keep the apts, but make them liveable!

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (9:00 PM) : 

Good idea, plaza renter, why doesn't Mark buy the apartments, invest some money to fix them up and rent them as moderate income housing.

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (9:15 PM) : 

Anon at 10pm...

Now that was funny!

 

Anonymous mainstream said ... (9:59 PM) : 

Why doesn't mainstream partner with Mark, buy them for a price that makes sense based upon what you have to invest in them to spruce 'em up, and then rent them for a reasonable return.

Why don't mainstream and Mark pass on he deal (instead of asking for a TIF) if the seller is holding out for top dollar?

Makes sense to me.

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (12:10 PM) : 

Doesn't this town have any ordinances to prevent or mitigate what the free market will do to our housing stock and historic structures?

I remember when one of the original Plaza buildings (had a grocery and bowling alley inside) was torn down for the ugly brown box that was temporarily a Saks. Now, the Plaza is barely an archeological remnant amid a financial district of high-rise glass towers.

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (1:20 PM) : 

anonymous 1:10PM,

There aren't really ordinances that I know of. Usually it's the job of your elected leadership to stand up for the neighborhood. Good luck with that. Your two elected councilpeople live within a stones throw of this development. One is chummy with the developers and the other probably doesn't even know 46th Street even exists.

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (1:21 PM) : 

lifelongcitizen,

You are a fucking moron. I hope Mark bans you.

 

Anonymous Robert Asher said ... (1:45 PM) : 

All of you talking about how run down those apartments are are full of it. Those buildings are GOLD MINES. I would buy any of them, fix 'em up, and do just fine with them.

If crap is falling apart, then you need to call Codes Enforcement and get those landlords fined. This is a CODE ISSUE. Not endemic urban blight. If we had a codes department and a housing court that could actually DO something, then these apartments wouldn't be tagged "blighted".

That said, anyone who knows anything about rental housing in midtown KC knows that these 6 to 12 plex "garden apartments" are the best cash-flowing properties in town. You can buy 'em for reasonable money, they're easy to work on, and they get decent rents.

Instead of giving city money to some out-of-town developers to take back to Texas with them, how about give me the TIF to buy the buildings and fix 'em up? Similar to the KCNA SMART grant that has been working wonders here on McGee Street. I'd jump on that in a second.

That said, Gottstein and Marcason are going to be hearing a lot from me in the near future about this...

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (4:39 PM) : 

Robert Asher, put your money where your mouth is and go buy the apartments and while your at it go buy the 45th & Main Holiday Inn. Then put enough money in them so they're not just slums that reduce the value of the homes and condos those of us in the Southmoreland neighborhood have invested our hard earned money in.

These aren't "garden apartments", they are run down eyesores that blight the entire neighborhood.

 

Anonymous LifeLongCitizen said ... (5:01 PM) : 

Anon 2:21 pm

Fortunately, Mark is a bit brighter than you and understands that thoughtful dialogue is what his blog is about, not simply the profane ranting of your ilk.

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (5:21 PM) : 

interesting that the star posted an article today about those hideous 80s buildings directly across the street being for sale... kick this guy over there and give grand street cafe a new home! how can you beat a direct view of the plaza and brush creek?

 

Anonymous maintream said ... (9:29 PM) : 

What's with Ray Braswell's involvement, does the developer know what they're doing?

That's like hiring Jeff Roe for your campaign, but worse.

I don't think Ray Braswell has any friends left in this town after West Edge and a few other things...

 

Anonymous mainstream said ... (9:31 PM) : 

mainstream posted above, my typing is truly pathetic.

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (10:23 AM) : 

What's happening with the West Edge anyway? I'd like to see it be something other than a big hole in the ground.

This is probably a dumb question, but why are the posts stamped with a time, but not a date? Is it assumed that we check these blogs constantly?

 

Anonymous seen him do it said ... (4:10 PM) : 

The definition of "blight" is watching Ray Braswell, drunk on his ass, trying desparately to pick up some woman half his age. He uses some of the same principles described above. It's not good for any neighborhood!

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (9:18 AM) : 

If you have an issue with Raymond Braswell, check him out on case.net.com, you might also want to check out his so-called educational creditials. I have.

 

post a comment
Google
WWW The Kansas City Post