Quote of the Day provided by The Free Library


Tuesday, August 28, 2007

Diversity, Assimilation and Civic Engagement


By Durwin Rice

The Kansas City Post


Diversity.

Is it really dead in America?

Pull up a chair. Screw political correctness and let's talk about a prickly subject.

Bowling Alone author Robert Putnam now tells us that diversity is not paying out the societal dividends we all assumed it embodied. His researchers studied the effects of ethnic diversity in 41 U.S communities interviewing 30,000 participants and found out that diversity creates citizens who:

1) distrust their neighbors more;

2) withdraw from even their closest friends;

3) expect the worst from their community leaders;

4) volunteer less;

5) give less to charity;

6) work less on community projects;

7) register to vote less;

8) agitate for social reform more but with less faith that they can make a real difference;

and

9) hunker down in front of their televisions more.

Now, don't shoot the messenger here...but that does sound a bit like the status quo of the local blogosphere.

Could it be that promoting cultural assimilation is just as important as promoting diversity?

Of course immediately, the "But what about New York?" thought leaps into most of our heads. That vibrant-in-everyone's-mind-town is diversity and that, of course, proves the worth of diversity despite contrary facts. Or, is it just the "flip side" paradox of the Yin and Yang of diversity? Diversity may well cause societal malaise but at the same time it is challenging us to be more productive and innovative as suggested by The Boston Globe.

At the minimum it is worth reading and talking about while you're trying to turn out thousands of volunteers (in what appears to be a dispirited community) to help you plant a million Tulips on Troost .

But The Better Together Report points out that another plant species is a better metaphor for dealing with our diversity along with our assimilation and civic engagement issues:

"The Saguaro. [pronounced sah-WAH-ro] is a cactus that grows in the Sonora desert in the Southwestern United States. There are rich parallels between the saguaro and social capital (or civic engagement). Saguaros were for some time undervalued by modern American society and often razed. Saguaros are bellwether indicators of the health of the ecosystem, and play the role of welcoming host for an environmentally-rich community: vines grow on its trunk; birds make nests in it; Native Americans have lived off its fruit and celebrate its blossoms in festivals; and animals use it for precious shade.

And, like most social capital, saguaros grow slowly and are tough, long-term survivors."

Comments on "Diversity, Assimilation and Civic Engagement"

 

Anonymous The Observer said ... (2:26 PM) : 

You strike some valid points. I believe the "Never forget where you came from" analogy plays into this.The more you preach any topic, teh more backlash you will get. Not saying we should all get along in harmony and all that, but, forced harmony is just as bad. People tend to naturally form groups, race, culture, or whatever is the cause, it just happens. You can prove this in small children just by watching at a day care.

Good article.

 

Blogger sophia said ... (4:55 PM) : 

As long as we're screwing political correctness, I'd like to opine that the promotion of "diversity" has only happened because the benefits of "reason," and "equality" were not readily apparent to whitey. It wasn't good enough to say - America, as a grand experiment in higher ordered living, is not about excluding someone from a certain job or neighborhood based on the color of their skin. It was necessary to argue that white people would benefit from their exposure to different races (in implicit offset of the corresponding loss of white privilege). That's the major theme of diversity promotion - here's what's in it for white folks.

As for the study under discussion, as far as I can tell, "diversity" was measured by skin color and not adherence to the cultural norms of one's ancestors, so I don't quite see where calls for "assimilation" are of much use. Is it the suggestion that we should strongly encourage the blending of races so that everyone is the same color and people are forced to find new ways of discriminating? That could take awhile and would probably involve more state interference than semi-annual workshops teaching people not to call Asians oriental.

The bottom line of this study, and what is seemingly completely ignored by Rice, is this -- racism is very present in our society (and arguably our species). Is this something we should ignore, resign ourselves to, or actively discourage?

 

Anonymous idan said ... (5:57 PM) : 

It is really too bad that most define diversity as "different skin color". I am a white guy that grew up in a large city and attended the most ethnically-diverse high school in my state. I then went to a nearly all-white, medium-sized university in a different state and in a rural setting. I was exposed to culture and ideas that I had never been before. It opened my eyes to things I had never imagined. It changed my outlook on the world. True diversity is diversity of thought and ideas. It is not so simple as skin color. It is really too bad so few people accept or recognize this fact.

 

Blogger KC Sponge said ... (8:35 PM) : 

The two articles you linked to did not describe how ethnic diversity was established . . . and if these pockets of diversity were compared to other places of less diverse nature when you used words like more and less - or if it is historically compared to the same area at a more segregated time.
I don't buy it. Maybe because I don't want to believe it. But I will keep working on bringing together communities by celebrating our differences and tolerating things we don't know or don't understand. That's the only reason I am not totally angered by this article. I think it brings about interesting debate and makes us talk about something at the gut level that should be talked about, but it balances nimbly on the irresponsible . . . it's already too easy and 'safe' to stick to where we are today, to keep to the things we know, the people we see everyday - I think in order to bring about change, we need to challenge people to break free of their assumptions and fears and comfort zone. . . this just gives thems an argument for stagnation.

 

Anonymous Joe Medley said ... (9:54 PM) : 

I would want to examine Putnam's methodology before I accepted anything in his study. But I'll go farther and offer this in rebuttal. An article in the July 2006 issue of a journal called "Employment Research" reported that openness to diversity was correlated with economic growth. It's interesting to note that one of the earliest experiments in cultural diversity, William Penn's Philadelphia, was the also the most prosperous of the 13 colonies. Is it a coincidence that New York, arguably the most diverse city in the United States is the economic engine of our nation?

Food for thought.

 

post a comment
Google
WWW The Kansas City Post