Take Me To Your Leader
By Durwin RiceThe Kansas City Post Finally something that makes sense from a city leader regarding light rail. The KC Star reports on Bill George, Jr.'s recent advice to Clay Chastain... "support the immediate planning for a starter line that can be built from the funds that exist through the current tax". What say you Clay? That sounds reasonable to me and you told us, at least once, that you are a reasonable man. Personally, I once thought I cared if a starter line went down Broadway or Main Street. But today, in the hopes of finding some leadership out of the current morass, I can truthfully tell you that I don't think it really matters. Of course, it's a shame nobody's suggesting that the starter line involve Troost Avenue, which currently is the highest trafficked commuter route in the city. And, it's also too bad that Mr. Nutter and Mr. Patterson don't want the starter line on Broadway. Broadway needs mass transit too, whether it goes through Penn Valley Park or not. Main Street would be a great line and so would Prospect, the city's 2nd highest traveled bus route. But Chastain maintains (correctly) that he doesn't have the authority to change the voter approved route on Broadway. Well, perhaps if we would all understand that a regional plan has got to begin somewhere we might just be able to find the leadership to ask whoever has that authority which street we dig up first? Maybe instead of asking the voters to vote against what they already voted for we ask them on which street or avenue they want to take their virgin light rail ride in Kansas City. If that turns out to, again, be Broadway, welcome to democracy Mr. Nutter and Mr. Patterson. Our Mayor likes to talk about a "well-thought-out regional plan". In "A Splendid Ride: The Streetcars of Kansas City" published in 2002 by Kansas City Star Books we learn that "At its peak, the cable car system of Kansas City was the third largest in the entire country, after only San Francisco and Chicago." There's also a nice map of that obviously successful regional plan on pages 174 and 175. It's kind of simple. Kansas City voters want light rail. A regional plan begins on one block. The city needs leadership so, what say you City Council? |







Comments on "Take Me To Your Leader"
-
Mark said ... (3:20 PM) :
-
DaveKCMO said ... (11:16 PM) :
-
Jay said ... (12:52 AM) :
-
Anonymous said ... (11:27 AM) :
-
Michelled said ... (9:51 AM) :
-
eastsider said ... (4:07 PM) :
-
Anonymous said ... (12:58 PM) :
post a commentDurwin,
You're certainly no shrinking violet! In one editorial you call out the mayor, Greg Patterson, Jim Nutter, Clay Chastain and the entire City Council.
Awesome. Let's just hope somebody is listening.
is the prospect route really #2 in ridership? i would have though #25, MAX, then #24.
Money money money! A regional approach? Lets look at Johnson County, they get most of the area transportation money. Oh, that would require us all to work/get a long. LOL Yeah like that is going to happen.
Having lived in cities with excellent mass transit (Philly, DC) I am on board with the need for a mass transit solution here in KC. And light rail seems to me the most obvious answer. And a regional plan (long-term) makes the most sense.
Having said that, this city is in debt and it is getting worse every day. TIF projects will rob us of any chance of catching up. How can we even remotely justify a light rail system with billions more in debt to come (Sewers, bridges, roads)? I know the voters want it, but so what.
I want an HDTV too. And a new van. Would really love a larger home. But I can afford none of these and no matter how much sense it makes to have them, I have to say no.
I love politicians with the guts to say NO to citizens when they have to. Yes, it may mean no re-election. So what. The city council should end this now and not risk another election.
We can't afford (for many reasons) NOT to have lightrail (or one of Mark's cool lightrailesque plans). Aren't we getting hit with big fines for our polution levels?
I'm not set on Clay's plan, never was (the gondolas are idiotic). I voted merely for lightrail and to give a big FU to a city council/mayor I was ticked at for pushing thru the stadium mess and continuing to say "the voters don't want lightrail". But I will not vote to repeal his plan unless something else is in place. That's just a ploy for them to continue to drag their feet - its been a year GET THE BALL ROLLIN"!
"a poll for the current plan in favor 71%."
And 80% of them won't come out to vote in a February election. Which means all I have to do is visit all the neighborhood associations east of troost and explain how light rail will gut the bus system and it's only going to benifit the midtown areas.
Eastsider
Congrats for being on the Citizen Task Force you lucky dog you.