It isn't easy being GreenKC
By Mark ForsytheThe Kansas City Post With every passing generation, there is always a "gap" when it comes to knowledge, opinion and even social norms. We live in a city where I know two-person households who claim they can't possibly make it under the two-bag limit on trash days. Recycling? Too much trouble for them. Yet ask any kid under the age of ten about recycling and chances are you will walk away having learned something. These are kids that will reach adulthood without ever having purchased an incandescent light bulb. Some will have never thrown a newspaper in a trash can. Believe it or not, there may very well be 10-year olds right now who will never own a vehicle with a gasoline engine. Such is the pace of our ever changing world. With this in mind, what kind of Kansas City are we preparing for these kids? Will it be a city that fosters and encourages the lessons being taught to every grade schooler? Or will it more likely be a place that falls short of their expectations? Will Kansas City fail to meet what today's kids know to be an Inconvenient Truth? It's too late for Kansas City to take the lead with Green Initiatives. Cities far more progressive than our own have already enacted legislation that will help them achieve significant reductions in their carbon footprint. But while we may have missed the chance to be first on the national front, we can certainly take the opportunity to stand out in Missouri and even the Midwest. Mayor Funkhouser should take this opportunity to leave a legacy of more than controversial board appointments and a toothless economic development policy. Granted, people like my three-trashbag-needing friends will be unimpressed. In fact, some initiatives may prove to be about as popular as a root canal. But the kids will love it! Once again, this is NOT an opportunity to hire consultants. Just - Increase Kansas City's use of renewable energy to 25% by 2020 - Leverage our municipal franchise agreement between the region's largest utility to directly affect a major source of carbon dioxide and other pollutants -- the production of electricity. - Plant ten thousand trees throughout Kansas City - Require the addition of at least one Electric Vehicle to the city fleet per year for the next 10 years. Encourage the continued use of Compressed Natural Gas and eventually Hydrogen in our larger fleet vehicles - Require energy efficiency retrofits of all city-owned buildings to meet a 20% or more reduction of energy consumption. Require a minimum of LEED Silver rating for all City subsidized projects without exception like the one made for the Sprint Center - Install at least one “green roof” on a City building - Identify fountains that can be retro-fitted for recirculation pumps rather than literally watching our drinking water go down the drain - Identify city properties that can be irrigated with a gray water system - Distribute a compact fluorescent light bulb to every household Cities and states that have enacted aggressive green initiatives have discovered a two-fold benefit. First, they have reduced their dependence on fossil fuels, but to some perhaps the happiest effect has been an marked increase in economic development around an entirely new industry. It may not be easy being green, it's certainly not easy going green, but I don't think anyone has a problem with it being profitable. |







Comments on "It isn't easy being GreenKC"
-
Anonymous said ... (12:04 PM) :
-
Anonymous said ... (1:27 PM) :
-
doinkman said ... (4:30 PM) :
-
DaveKCMO said ... (8:25 PM) :
-
CandygramForMongo said ... (9:02 PM) :
-
Michelled said ... (1:19 PM) :
-
Craig said ... (7:13 PM) :
-
Hall Monitor said ... (9:50 AM) :
-
mainstream said ... (10:00 PM) :
-
Mark said ... (3:18 PM) :
post a commentI read in the Star about Green MBAs. Seems like everybody is getting in on green these days except KC.
Green MBAs??
What's that?
it's a MBA w/ an emphasis on 'green' business.
'Green' is beginning to be overused in my opinion...but it's still something that should be strived for. Not just for the environmental benefits, which are often too esoteric, but because it's a more efficient way for things to operate. Use less energy & water = duh.
I like all these ideas, especially the planting trees and greywater for irrigation...but Hydrogen cars? Lets just get personal jetpacks instead, at least the technology is available. :)
also, I believe the reason we don't recirculate fountain water is because people swim in them often and without disinfection that can be a health hazard.
also (again): You are describing what the rain garden initiative strives to be. That was KC taking a 'green' initiative and it gets laughed at anytime it's mentioned.
i wasn't aware it was legal to swim or even wade in city fountains.
green is no more overused than "information superhighway" or "cyberspace" were a decade ago. before long it will be the default view rather than the intriguing sidebar... hence, no more special labels.
I love to take my dog wading in fountains.
Wait a minute....A DOG WATER PARK!
Anybody have Deb Hipp's phone number?
:o)
I applied for the dog parks committee - I'll pass your suggestion along. ;-) If I by chance make it on, I will be pushing for a dog waste recycling/energy program like the one in SF as a part of the long term plan. http://environment.about.com/od/renewableenergy/a/animalwaste.htm
I'm sure it will be laughed at as KC seems set to dig their heels in on everything we CAN'T do instead of believing we can. With almost 50% of households having dogs there's a lot of poop.
Have you read the Green Solutions Position Paper? It has been adopted by the City Council, and the City Manager is to submit a plan for implementing the strategies set out in that document. Of course, the plan will be as toothless as the ozone action plan, but the Paper itself is an impressive document, and I think a basis for more progress.
http://cityclerk.kcmo.org/liveweb/Documents/Document.aspx?q=7xShwuCmv%2f8eonxJOIekxfRiiYznEVv1LObD0gFBGzLokE47pdAe%2fKF6IZoheM6h
The mayor could start being green by carpooling with Gloria--it's foolish that they drive 2 cars to work every day.
I agree. And one or both of them could take The Max. It literally stops two blocks from their house, and can drop them off in front of City Hall.
mainstream,
Where have you been? I thought you got bored with The Post.
I wish the mayor would at least take the MAX once a week. At the minimum he could do a Funk Fridays on the MAX or something. Consider it a weekly town hall with transit riders. What better way to show you're "common folk" and elevate the profile of transit?