When all else fails, baffle them with... bureaucracy?
By Mark ForsytheThe Kansas City Post Mayor Funkhouser has seemingly decided that rather than focus on his campaign promises; efficient government, basic city services and fiscal responsibility he will instead try and create useless layers of bureaucracy. The mayor recently claimed he "heard over and over on the campaign trail and since taking office that immigrants want a point of contact at City Hall to help with incorporating new arrivals into the Kansas City community." This ranks right up there with "I was asked to run", "I've received numerous phone calls from community leaders" and my favorite "I'm a consensus builder." Vague proclamations of support lend no credibility to the argument. Even in the face of valid criticism, and with a looming budget deficit the mayor is sending two staffers to Chicago for a big conference on Immigrant Integration. I can't prove the things I heard "over and over" on the campaign trail but there is a record of the questions asked repeatedly at public forums. The candidates were queried about development incentives, the school district and basic city services. A quick check back through my notes does not show one question regarding "Will you establish an office of immigration at City Hall?" In fact I heard nothing about immigration on the campaign trail. Perhaps the mayor needs to go over his notes again. Mayoral aide Crispin Rea implied that "a City Hall person" could help immigrants with any number of issues. Our immigrant population in Kansas City is diverse as it is large. If one person is going to be tasked with handling all that, it's going to take one amazing individual! Where will we find this magical person? That's going to be some help wanted ad! Wanted: Office of Immigration Administrator. The successful candidate must be fluent in at least seven (preferably many more) languages. Will be an expert in cultures as diverse and far-ranging as Chinese to Somalian and everywhere in between. Must be able to move seamlessly across religious boundaries and have a background in dispute resolution amongst mono and poly-theistic, agnostic, and atheistic beliefs as well as the thousands of sub-categories of each. Will have legal expertise in the area of immigration from sovereign nations of every continent. Candidate must be a people person, consensus builder, self-starter and any other worthless buzz expression currently making the corporate circuit. As always, preference will be given to applicants with previous work experience from the city of Denver. I seem to remember estimates around $1 million per year for a landlord licensing office. Could an office of immigration cost any less? Let's take a look at what the mayor could accomplish with the $1 million he wants to spend on his latest boondoggle. Dangerous Buildings - Originally we had a City Hall employee who brokered agreements to get abandoned buildings into the hands of individuals (not developers) who would rehabilitate and live in them. This saved a great deal of our historic housing stock and essentially paid for itself by saving the City the cost of condemning, boarding up and eventually demolishing the structures. The position was eliminated for "budgetary reasons." Greenhouse Facilities - Also another victim of budget cuts, the City used to maintain a full nursery to grow its own street trees as well as plants for parks and public right-of-ways. At the minimum we should be growing our own trees instead of funneling huge bucks to private nurseries. Metal Plates - Instead of the useless legislation passed a few weeks ago, actually implement a real program for metal plates in the street. I have just listed three things off the top of my head over a half cup of coffee. I'm sure there are even better things the City can be doing with a million dollars. Especially a million dollars we don't even have. |







Comments on "When all else fails, baffle them with... bureaucracy?"
-
doinkman said ... (1:59 PM) :
-
Mark said ... (2:50 PM) :
-
Anonymous said ... (3:46 PM) :
-
Michelled said ... (4:15 PM) :
-
Dustin said ... (5:14 PM) :
-
Alan Birch said ... (5:52 PM) :
-
mainstream said ... (10:28 PM) :
-
the wife said ... (9:48 AM) :
-
Alan Birch said ... (10:23 AM) :
-
Michelled said ... (12:40 PM) :
post a commentso you're going from discounting that one person could do the job to saying that this office would cost $1 million dollars to run? Give me a break.
The original estimates for one landlord licensing administrator were for $1 million per year. This included at least one but probably two or three employees dedicated as support staff, office space, equipment, standard overhead, and an operational budget. I'm just using the City's own figures for an apples to apples comparison.
Thanks for reading.
And the Funk apologists weigh in immediately.
Mark you are dead on. Establishing an office of anything, even if it's just one person costs far more than just that person's salary. An immigration office budget would be breathtaking. Just think of the printing. All those languages? There would of course have to be an advertising campaign that would make 311 look like a drop in the bucket.
I'm sure it would result in another juicy contract for some private firm here in town. Any way you look at it it's a huge waste of money.
I think this is a brilliant way to run the immigrants out of KC. Funk is pure genius!
I'm far from a Funk apologist... my response was to question the comparison and logic on the argument.
I understand an additional office = bureaucracy = overhead costs. But overhead isn't 20 or even 10 times salaries. Period.
This was pretty obvious a concession to try to keep La Raza here (didn't work). From listening to the mayor on up-to-date, my impression is that this position isn't going to be filled until May at the earliest.
Why don't we all find something else to be outraged about today.
Recall Funky now.
I've never supported the idea of a recall before, but really: If people think they can run for public office with one set of promises and then immediately reneg on those promises the day after inauguration... Reign 'em in!
Recall Funky now. I'll sign the petition right now.
For the candidate who campaigned on "being smart with the money" this is a patently absurd, obvious waste of money.
And if Funk says one more time it's only a coincidence that he's introducing this legislation now and it has nothing to do with La Raza, I'm going to rent a billboard near downtown that calls Funk a blantant liar, and a demagogue.
He has the nerve to criticize all of the wasteful spending as auditor for 18 years and then proposes a useless one-person office of immigration affairs?
Oh, and Funk has INSISTED before that immigration is a federal, not a city matter, remember that?
Oh and that's right, Crispy Rea has done all the research and recommends this.
Nice staffing Funk. You make incredibly poor hiring decisions and then set up these nice people for ridicule - and failure.
Nice job all-around Funk.
I voted for Funk b/c I thought he was going to improve basic city services. I've witnessed no improvement to basic city services since Funk took office - the campaign promise which induced me to vote for him. However, I don't remember any campaign promise to appropriate funds for a new city office which duplicates services better served by private 501c3 organizations.
This is an obvious ploy to mend relations with the Hispanic community after his amazing political missteps. It's too bad he couldn't have the common sense to Google all of his appointees before their appointment and the foresight to know that appointing an active member of the Minutemen would cause a political shit storm from which he may never escape.
I think Funky's biggest problem is his absurdly idiotic staffing choices. Come on! Gloria? Crispin? Joe? Do these people know ANYTHING? Funky's as politically inept as me. I mean, if I was mayor, I'd just hire all of my friends and then we'd do whatever we wanted and everyone else could go to hell. But then again, I'd never be able to get elected. I guess I've got the wrong friends.
The thing I can't stand about Funky is that he makes mistakes that even I wouldn't make, and I'm a moron in politics.
Let's just recall him now, using his ineptitude as the basis, and get someone with some actual qualifications in there.
BTW: Sorry to all of you who didn't vote for Funky. You were right, and I was wrong.
Alan, we wouldn't be an ounce better off with Brooks as our mayor. I didn't vote for Funk in the primary but in the general, even in hindsight wouldn't vote differently.
Mark, your wife is brilliant and I concur with her comments- when is she going to guest blog?!