Cordish stance on light rail: Allow me to retort
| By Mark Forsythe The Kansas City Post ![]() Beggars can't be choosers. It's a simple lesson, spanning most cultures that is taught to us at a young age. The idea is that anyone receiving charity should be contrite. You're not carrying your weight in society so you should quietly accept others' generosity and be happy about it. Apparently this lesson does not apply in the world of business and tax subsidized development. Cordish Inc. who has been the recipient of millions of our tax dollars is convinced that not only as beggars do they get to choose, but they should be in charge. In an article in the Kansas City Star, Nick Collison reveals that Cordish has issued a letter to the mayor stating their opposition to a light rail route on Grand... Or Main... Or Walnut... Or Baltimore. Regardless of your position on light rail, it's easy to be angered by the attitude of the management of the Power & Light District. Not only are they like the annoying house guest that eats your food, drinks your beer and leaves their messes for you to clean, they interject themselves by offering unsolicited opinions about how you should run your life. I think it's safe to say most of us would grow tired of such a guest. Cordish maintains that light rail will disrupt their business by limiting pedestrian access to parking garages. To this I would respond "absolutely!" For the two whole minutes that the light rail train happens to pass by. Is that really going to kill the Power & Light District? Isn't the real issue the kind of people Cordish fears that public transit will bring to the district? I understand that business is business. But by sending a letter to the mayor, Cordish is subtly announcing their intentions that they will oppose any ballot measure that puts light rail downtown. The logical progression would be to assume they will spend huge amounts of dollars on an opposition campaign in order to "protect their interests." Considering our current business arrangement, that would mean they are going to spend huge amounts of our own tax dollars to sway public opinion. I'm all about protecting interests. Perhaps the mayor should respond that Kansas City is going to protect its interest in public safety and help Cordish out with the increased amount of police presence that they have continually requested. Perhaps every night the Power & Light District should be ringed with highly visible sobriety check points. Since Cordish is so worried about giving its patrons easy access to their parked vehicles, I'm certain they are not allowing anyone to leave their establishments in an impaired condition. All that police presence would give Power & Light patrons a sense of security. Right? We've made our deal with Cordish and it seems our chickens have come home to roost. Numerous downtown night spots have closed. Areas like Westport and the Plaza have seen a decline in business, which directly correlates to a decline in our tax revenues. We anxiously await what will surely be a shortfall in revenue from the P&L District leaving us to scramble to find funds to pay the bond interest. And now the latest big player in town is going to tell us what to do with our transit. I think maybe we should tell Cordish what they can do for once. |







Comments on "Cordish stance on light rail: Allow me to retort"
-
Brent said ... (9:47 AM) :
-
Anonymous said ... (9:48 AM) :
-
Alan Birch said ... (9:55 AM) :
-
Eric Rogers said ... (10:04 AM) :
-
the wife said ... (10:27 AM) :
-
Jim said ... (12:51 PM) :
-
Mark said ... (1:01 PM) :
-
Anonymous said ... (3:05 PM) :
-
Alan Birch said ... (7:25 PM) :
-
Alan Birch said ... (7:31 PM) :
-
chad said ... (12:34 AM) :
-
Anonymous said ... (8:22 AM) :
-
Joe Medley said ... (8:52 AM) :
-
Anonymous said ... (9:17 AM) :
-
Anonymous said ... (9:39 AM) :
-
Anonymous said ... (10:40 AM) :
-
Mark said ... (10:56 AM) :
-
Anonymous said ... (11:28 AM) :
-
Anonymous said ... (2:20 PM) :
-
Anonymous said ... (2:29 PM) :
-
Anonymous said ... (8:42 PM) :
-
Joe Medley said ... (9:16 PM) :
post a commentCordish protesting this is just absurd to me. Think about the number of potential bar goers that will choose to go to the P&L district vs others because they'll have the ability to have "1 more beer" and take the train vs having to get behind the wheel of a car. Folks in midtown, the Plaza, UMKC, Rockhurst, River market, Northland, etc will all have easier access to the P&L district with the improved transit options.
This is extremely short sighted on their part. In fact, the only really rational explanation to why they don't want it there is exactly what you suggest -- they "type of element" they'll attract. Never mind that there are help wanted signs in most of the businesses, maybe this could help them get additional workers there?
This is a huge slap in the face to the community -- and I can assure you that if they spend a dime campaigning against light rail, that will be one dime more than I'll ever spend in one of their businesses again...
Couldn't agree more with this post Forsythe.
I especially like the idea about sobriety check points. That should get across who calls the shots in this town.
Great idea.
Brent, don't you get it? Why would P&L want riders from 63rd and Prospect to have an easy trip to their area? After the novelty and newness of this useless light rail route wears off the only people that ride are going to be East Kansas Citians coming downtown to hassle JoCo tourists.
For once, and I'd bet only this one instance, do I agree with Cordish. I don't really care what their specific motives are, just so it gets the results we need: Vote NO on this useless light rail plan.
Don't forget that Cordish gets a cut of the revenue from the city-owned parking garages in the P&L. Every person that arrives at P&L via transit instead of automobile is a little bit of lost revenue for Cordish.
It's just one of they many examples of how this city is so incredibly addicted to parking. Remember how the city's own Aviation Department spoke out against like light rail because they didn't want to lose parking revenue??
I'd feel safer going to P&L on transit than I would parking 4 blocks away and then trying to make it back to my car after dark.
Alan Birch sounds a lot like crash046 did over on the Star's light rail blog (http://primebuzz.kcstar.com/?q=taxonomy/term/55).
Both seem to only want to stir things up by being irrational opponents of light rail when in reality probably don't even care about the outcome of the issue.
Freeom of speech is a great thing... I guess I have to put up with theirs?
Jim,
I'm sure to Alan Birch my opinions are just as grating. What's the saying in law? Reasonable minds can disagree?
Freedom of speech is indeed a great thing. It allows me to have this platform to express my opinions.
Thanks for reading.
In the case of freedom of speech. Alan Birch is pretty much an @#$%hole. East Kansas Citians are entitled to enjoy all the benefits of our public areas. If light rail gives them easier access to the wallets of unsuspecting WASPS like Mr. Birch. Please build it as fast as possible.
Anybody know whose houses and businesses are getting torn down to build this? Anyone know what the route is? No. I do not comment over on the Star blogs, but I can assure you that my home and my businesses are all at stake over this big waste of public money.
Light rail in Kansas City is first and foremost a land grab and a money grab by real estate developers, heavy constructors, and engineering firms. $1 billion dollars is a large pot of gold and you can bet there's going to be lots of scrabble to get some of it.
Let me ask all of you light rail supporters: Can you give me one example of city-backed, taxpayer-sponsored projects in Kansas City in the last 20-30 years that has actually performed up to expectations? We are all being promised pie, but before it's over, we'll all be eating crap.
If you cannot bear the thought of living in a city with no rail transport, then you need to vote "no" on this light rail plan and hope that regional leaders will get together and make a REGIONAL transit plan.
If you truly support pragmatic, democratic public transportation in this decentralized city, then you really ought to get behind an improved bus system and forget about this vanity project. Light rail from North Oak and Vivion to one stop south of the Plaza is not going to increase access to my wallet, or anyone elses. East Side or anywhere else.
Am I an asshole? Yes, you are correct, I suppose. But I'm no dummy. The people who are "in charge" in this town do not have yours, mine, or Mark's best interests in mind.
But I suppose I should clarify: As far as my opinion is concerned, Cordish and Company can piss off and all of the players who had a hand in giving our city up to these snakes should be politically punished.
I'm thinking Kay Barnes and Andi Udris, but if someone wants to pull together a bigger list, I'd appreciate it.
I'd feel safer going to P&L on transit than I would parking 4 blocks away and then trying to make it back to my car after dark.
Then why not ride the bus down there today? Tonight you can get within about 2 blocks of P&L via a city bus.
I honestly don't understand it when I hear people say "I would take public transit only if..." then they make up some excuse. Quit making excuses. If you believe in public transit, we have it today. Go out and use it today.
If people refuse to ride the bus today, why should we believe them when they say they would ride a train tomorrow?
Bravo Mark. Well said. Can I vote for you again?
"the only people that ride are going to be East Kansas Citians coming downtown to hassle JoCo tourists"
"Hassle JoCo tourists"? This kind of stereotyping has no place in public discourse. For three years, I've taken a bus to work has passengers from 63rd and Prospect. I've never been hassled by anyone.
Very nice post Mark. Perhaps Cordish can explain how light rail limits access to parking garages more than automobiles do? If the auto traffic is backed up and blocking access, how is that different than light rail stopping briefly?
Interesting that the council is not in session the week Cordish sends their letter.
Are we to rely on the Parks Board to deal with this as well?
Apparently, I forgot to add my [sarcasm] tags to my first post from 9:55am yesterday.
Cordish has a racist dress code policy, so it's only a logical conclusion that their opposition to public transportation would have racial origins...
Forsythe for mayor!
Anony 10:40AM,
No offense, but are you crazy?!
My wife is far too busy to tell me how to run the city. ;-)
Great ideas Mark. Unfortunately Cordish will just continue to buy their way with campaign donations like every other special interest in this town.
I wonder which mayoral candidate Cordish will be hosting fundraisers for?
I would vote for you! Better than what we have now for sure.
Word is the Kempers at UMB aren't supporting a Grand Street route either. They don't like the crowd that hangs out at their Grand Street corner now and believe light rail will only bring more of it.
This line of thinking seems way to misguided for well-educated, intelligent, successful people.
Don't forget Cordish's self-serving objections to other Kansas City entertainment areas obtaining a festival permit. When it comes to anything "Cordish" DO NOT TRUST!
I love the pulp fiction photo. What a shame we can't get Jules Winnfield to pay the Cordish family a little visit.