San Francisco Values? Yes Please!
| Props to political operative Jeff Roe for coining a phrase that will remain in the Kansas City lexicon for some time; "San Francisco Values". Meant as a scare tactic to stir up homophobic fears among conservative voters, the phrase has become something of an inside joke amongst liberal Kansas City voters. To me, the phrase has nothing to do with Kay Barnes, Nancy Pelosi or strangely dressed actors who can't dance. To me the phrase evokes visions of a city not content with enjoying its geographical advantages of being a temperate coastal town. It's a city not content with a thriving tourist economy, a world class symphony, competitive professional sports franchises and excellent transit. To me San Francisco Values are the competitive "what's next?" attitude that keeps world class cities world class. There's a war going on out west. Mayor Sam Adams of Portland, Oregon and Mayor Gavin Newsome of San Francisco, California are engaged in a friendly, albeit serious war of words over which city will lead the country in EV (Electric Vehicle) technology. To most, electric cars still seem like a distant concept never to be realized. I have followed technological developments of EVs for years. It always seemed like production was "five years away" and then as that date approached, production was still another five years away. But there is a growing storm of innovation that indicates to me that this time it's for real. EVs are here. Tesla Roadsters are speeding around the Bay area, with one even sighted right here in Kansas City. BMW owned Mini is conducting road tests of an EV version of their popular Cooper. Heavyweight Nissan is building an entire plant that will begin manufacturing EVs in Tennessee. While our more progressive cousins to the west are scrambling to position themselves for the new economy, Kansas City and the rest of the heartland seems content in shuffling along at the back of the pack. Our utilities seek to build more coal-burning power plants and consider nuclear power to be sustainable energy. Our zoning ordinances encourage, even demand parking capacities that far exceed that which is necessary. Our elected leaders pay lip service to "Green" initiatives without truly understanding sustainable practices. What Sam Adams and Gavin Newsome are doing is a stroke of genius. Competition breeds innovation. Even though the whole "war" is simply a public relations ploy, they have elevated the conversation and made the race for supremacy very real. The result will mean more jobs, more economic activity and a huge step up on the rest of the country. Kansas City used to be known as the Paris of the Plains. Is there no one willing to lead the charge? Kansas City needs commerce. Kansas City needs industry. Continuing to shuffle tax abated retail developments around town is all too similar to the expression about rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. Can we compete with the likes of Portland and San Francisco? Maybe. But maybe the better question is can we afford not to? |







Comments on "San Francisco Values? Yes Please!"
-
Anonymous said ... (8:24 AM) :
-
Anonymous said ... (9:20 AM) :
-
Anonymous said ... (9:34 AM) :
-
Anonymous said ... (9:53 AM) :
-
idan said ... (10:35 PM) :
-
Joe Medley said ... (7:12 PM) :
-
rxlexi said ... (11:08 PM) :
post a commentPortland and San Francisco have real mayors. Look who's running the show in KC. Enough said.
It would be nice if we had a functioning government. How do we attract business, conventions, etc. when we don't even have viable transportation from the airport to downtown.
That Gavin Newsome is dreamy:-)
Whereas our co-mayors are simply nightmarish
Doesn't San Francisco have horrible gentrification? Some of the worst in the country. Just askin'. Have they created a super city by moving out all the "undesirables" and replacing them with high rent payers and making this amazing city. Maybe I am cynical. But if KC could send all its problems to Oakland we might have an easier time making a wonderful place to live.
We may have a diversity of thought in this city, that San Francisco doesn't have to deal with, but I like that about our city; people with different points of view. I may disagree with some people but different ideas are healthy and good. Diversity is a good thing... even diversity of thought which is what I believe is true diversity.
Can we do better? Yes. But we will need to do it our way. Not the San Fran way. I don't think we want to do it the San Fran way.
I will go to the Bay Area again, and probably soon. But I will be headed to Oakland.
"How do we attract business, conventions, etc. when we don't even have viable transportation from the airport to downtown."
We don't attract business. We grow it from within. I'm not sure how we do that, but I am sure that no city ever became world class with imported industry.
I don't know about becoming world class, but I do know a number of cities that have, at least, grown dramatically with an increase in imported industy - Dallas, Charlotte, ATL, etc.
Re: electric vehicles in KC- it will be such a coup if we can land the Kokam Battery USA plant that is proposed in Lee's Summit to complement the Smith Electric Vehicle HQ at KCI.
I suppose that might be one development where you would support heavy city or state subsidy Mark, as that is what Kokam appears to be after? I know I would.